So....The dead dog this year didn't really happen.
Posted by Antimon on Wed, 2006-07-12 18:15
This page is from a past convention. It is kept here for archival and informational purposes only.
Please visit our forums for the latest announcements and discussion.
Please visit our forums for the latest announcements and discussion.
|
|

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket
Location: Chicago, IL
Since room assignments fall under programming, you should email your concern to programming.2007 AT anthrocon.org.
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Orlando, FL
We can look at securing an additional room...however, everyone should be aware that the Zoo is for everyone...not just artists.
Having the Zoo open for any amount of time after the convention's closing is a courtesy the con is providing for all attendees.
KP
Anthrocon Programming Director
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkThank you KP
you're the best
I offer my dj services but somone needs to bring the speakers
(already contacted simbalion about the main dances i don't think he oversee's the dead dog per se as it's not a con fuction exactly.
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Chicago, IL
You'd be correct! I only book DJs for the dances in the main ballroom, however I'm also responsible for equipment requests, for example, a PA for the Dead Dog Party
With the Dead Dog and Capsule Lounge, booking DJs falls under the person/people running those.
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkyeah havign dances in the big ballroom wasn't that practical, i'm curios if it'll be there again or not i know there was sugestions and such of moving them to the hotel, which is both a good idea and yet causes a serious set of challenges at the same time so i dunno got plenty of time to figure all that out
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Orlando, FL
Moving the dances to the hotel really isn't an option for a number of strategic reasons. Not the least of which is the audio setup required for the dances. All of that equipment is already in place at the Convention Center and we simply can't remove it and relocate it.
We have to keep many, many things in mind when scheduling events. Cost of moving things, spacial considerations, equipment needs for other events, and also trying to minimize the number of conflicts between like events. We have to be able to maximize our use of internal resources while providing the best possible experience for the largest number of attendees. I'm always open to suggestions, but we do need to keep them realistic and if there is a reason for something being done a certain way, folks need to incoporate that into their requests.
KP
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkwell no moving the equipment is obviously not feasble. but the smalleer room woudl require a much small setup. So i'd sugest duplicating the equoment. As it is the room where the charity auction was needed audio anyway (you jacked into the house setup). So when you look at the cost of union labor to reset the ball room in the dlcc, the cost of using in house audio, etc it might be finacially feasible and beneficial to rent a second, smaller setup. the lights wouldn't need to be in the main ball room, (just some spots) you could keep the projector and film equipment there. All you'd need is a small mixer and a decent speaker setup. Not cheap but on the scope of the budget might be possible cus you'd never have to reset the main ballroom the entire weekend.
There are other issues though, noise issues with hotel, noise polution of the zoo. By no means am i saying this is a simple thing to consider. But it does need to be evaluated to see if there is a better solution. After crunching the nubmers and working the logistics it may still be the msot feasble place for the dances are in the main ballroom, that doesn't stop the evaluation of alternatives though. At the very least perhaps we can look at some light weight easy to move baffeling (depending on labor costs of setup) to reduce the visual size and reverb of the room. I realsie what can be done is limited Not trying to stress the staff or complaing for the sake of whining. You know me K.P. I'm trying to be constructive and beneficial.
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Ardmore, PA
Website: [Link]
Blog: [Link]
> So i'd sugest duplicating the equoment
Have a spare 4-5 figures of money laying around? A/V equipment is expensive to rent.
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkdepends on what you rent. how much did the resetting of the chairs cost ya
i'd say buy the crap but well you're out of room in your little locker and little truck 
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Chicago, IL
Resetting the room as we did this year was far far cheaper than renting a second PA for a dance of the size we put on. You have to appreciate exactly how much equipment is involved with the 3 dances. It's not just an amp rack and some speakers. The projector system (projector and screen), several computers, the PA (amps, speakers) lighting, fog machine, turntables, and of course volunteers to run it all.
The main ballroom is actually the most practical place to hold the dances, which is why they're held there. The cost of resetting the chairs was a nuisance, but does not even compare to the cost of the equipment. The projector alone costs more for the weekend than the chairs did. Part of growing as large as we have is that we'll have to deal with these kinds of transitions.
As for buying, we do own some of the equipment but renting provides a great deal of conveniences. For example, less concern about equipment not surviving the event. We purchased a pair of nice dance lighting units a few years back called an Orbitron. Personally it's my favorite lighting effect from the dances, and was really cool for about the 4 hours that it worked. We now have one working orbitron, and one expensive paperweight.
update: To address your concern about the echo in the room, I will be exploring solutions for that for 2007. If you've got any specific suggestions to that effect (or anything else about improving the experience in the ballroom) I encourage you to email them to smblion (at) anthrocon (dot) org
- Login or register to post comments
permalinki think you're missing a fundemental point though. I'm not saying duplicate it all, nor am i saying use the double set up JUST for the dances.
i've never run a con so pardon me if my asumptions are completly off bass here but this is what i suspect.
1) the dances are virtually a free asset (in terms of raw cost) because:
- you need to rent the room it's held in for the duration of the con anyway for houseign equipment, to minimuse set up tiem etc
- the equpiment you rent (projector speakers, computers) are multi event and is the same stuff you need to run a masqurade, 2 and kage etc
-the only equipment specific to teh dances are soem fancy lights (the cost to rent these is the same regardless of where they get set up) and while nice are not a requirment
- granted you need staff and security to cover the time again required regardless of location
2) you can (and i have) run dances with just that, an amp a small mixer and some speakers, just because somthing always has been doen a certain way does not mean it has to continue that way forever.
3) At times you need more then one event to have full audio support
- charity auction was not 9to my surprize) held in the main ballroom, it needed audio
- You could run masquarde rehersal and NOT tie up your main ball room
- you could run masgot games in the room (again much better with full audio, talk to megaplex staff about that)
- bigger pannals coudl use full audio
- it gives you a smaller fuction ballroom enviornment for other possible events
Now reasons to not hold the dance in the DLCC
- far from hotel for a majority of suiters making suit changes or outfit changes take much longer
- uncomfortably large for the size of the dances due to attendence
- uncomfortbaly dark, you can't (afford to) properly light that room cus the house lights make it too bright for the non suiters to enjoy and the effects lights just get lsot in the space..you mentioend fog machine, i never aaw it used
- a nightmare for audio, it sounded like crap in there, the frotn speakers were beign over driven and i told the staff several tiems they were poping the front right sub cabbinat, the reverb was rediculas, parts of the room were too loud others too quiet, again you dotn have the equipment or budget to pproperly sound that room for music
So in summerry dancing there was very unplesent, i think a majority fo peopel woudl perfer a less techy smalelr room, dance then a high tech high budget not fun experience in the main ball room.
It may cost more, but then again it may not, and if it's affordabel in the budget and makes the experience MORE enjoyable, I would think you'd want to research that. You dont have unlimited money no, but hwo you spend that mopney is very important and a few dollers spent in some area's means more then others
Back to equipment, the dances dont need a projector screen, it's cool but we can live without it, it's needed much more in the main ballroom
the effects lights aren't needed in the main ballroom, they are nice for the dance so youc an still rent one set and just set them up elsewhere or scrap them all together. So so far we're talkign doubel speakers and an amp. you need probably a system half the size of what you have for the room i'm thinking of. You'll probably need to rent a light truss so far only new dance only expense associated per my calculation. again the audio setup would have countless uses over the course of the con.
Have the dj's (msot do anyway) bring their own turntables, con shouldn't have to supply that (possibly problem here with the one night they quickly swap out liability if one dj uses anothers tables, so you might not be able to do that)
Lets put it thsi way if you hodl the dance in the DLCC again you'll see fewer and fewer turn out i think. Ac used to be one of the best dances, last year it was the worst. ANd i dont think you cna improve it enough in that room to go back to where you were in the standings.
I may be the only once saying anything right now, everyone i talked to agree's
Again you might be stuck with this but So far I dont see anyone actually researching the posability seriously. Sometiems i wonder if Anthrocon has grown so large that the organizers loose soght fop the simple cheap and dirty solutions the smaller cons have to rely on to survive. Soem things are major productions, by nessicity. Not everything has to be. look for the simpler solutions.
Maybe the dances should be scraped all together (or reduced in number) but as i said near as i can tell it's virtually a free event (exception of turn tables, extra lights, and possibly extra dorsia money i dunno how that works) so even if only 100 take advanage of it it's good to have.
I'm about doen on thsi topic i said what I can it's up to the staff and board to either take the tiem to research it (at the behest of the unhappy attendee's) or shrug it off as "we're doing everything we can" we knwos there are issues, this is the only solution we have" and proceed as last year
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkp.s the dead dog in the zoo was the best dance of the con the most fun and it was the most simple thing...so just rememebr that
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Ardmore, PA
Website: [Link]
Blog: [Link]
*stares blankly*
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkmeaning if you had 400 people at the dance you need that room
and it wouldn't feel so.....barron.
This was really only an issue the first night
the later nights where they only cleared the middle helped a lot, and amde it comfortably crowded, course it made navigating TO that section much more difficult for the completly blinded suiters due to the darker nature of the room.
may i suggest wider isles next year (during the dances atleast)
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkthsoe the white orb things? with the moving line of dots? eyah those are cool.
As to teh echno I''m nto a sound engineer and i dunno what your options are for fake walls and diffusers and such. But anything you can do would be welcomed. Those were the 2 biggest issues, the sound quality and the lighting leval. If tyouc an address them in the room you got you're a hero but i fear it'll cost more then a relocation and provide less overal benefit but good luck
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: NewCastle Delaware
i was at the dead dog party last year at the zoo and it was a ton of fun i didnt hear anyone complaining about it...and i have alot of artist friends..it was certainly big enough to hold everyobe who wanted to be there...
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Ardmore, PA
Website: [Link]
Blog: [Link]
Heh. That's because you weren't in Con Ops. We had the pleasure of one particularly irritated individual on Sunday evening who treated us to his (rather profane) opinion on the matter.
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Philadelphia area, PA
Oh, for the love of... *holds head in claws*
It's a party; it's not life or death.
I'm sorry y'all had to put up with such inappropriate behavior. Sadly, some folks just don't know how to assume the best in others and express their concerns politely.
--dester'edra
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: NewCastle Delaware
-pet pet the Giza- I think its really sad that people dont know how to share space. are we still going to have the dead dog party in the zoo? By the by...I agree with dester'edra...-kinda smacks forehead with her paw at people who would complain-
-Sunshadow
- Login or register to post comments
permalink