2008 Registration Totals
Posted by Recherei on Mon, 2008-08-04 12:51
|
Just read Giza's posting: http://www.anthrocon.org/history-registration-2008 THERE'S A 100 YEAR OLD FURRY! |
Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket
Location: Laredo, TX
Website: [Link]
I can also see theres a small but not insignificant increase of a number of international furrys. I wonder why the Germans find us so interesting...
Disappointed though Texas is still the same spot. WE WERE ALMOST TO 100 FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkWell maybe more furs would fly in from Texas if half the planes didn't melt from the heat down there
-Okay, we're up to one (1) so far...
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Boise, ID
Website: [Link]
Only 3 from Idaho? Well, I'll be adding to that number next year. And I'll be in a suit too!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
http://foxydude915.deviantart.com/
http://z4.invisionfree.com/Idaho_Fur_Syndicate/index.php?act=idx
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Mystic, CT
Blog: [Link]
We may have an.. incorrect birthdate somehow. It's been known to happen.
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkI dunno. In recent years the appeal of furry, (what used to be called "Funny Animals"), art and fiction has expanded to a much broader age demographic. It would be interesting to hear about the fandom from his unique point of view.
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Roseville, CA, USA
Do you not find it creditable that there might be a 100-year-old Furry? We used to have a fan named Harry Bear, whom I met 11 years ago, who was in his 80's at that time. I will admit that I haven't seen him about lately, but it is possible he was there. Kelly Freas, the illustrator for numerous SciFi magazine covers, comic covers, record jackets, Madison Avenue full-page adverts, and parodies of such in MAD magazine and Playboy, and a man who did Vargas-style pinup art on the noses of bombers in the south pacific during WWII - he was not a young man, but I saw him at ConFURence, hanging around our artshow - and in his Han Solo hall costume.
It is quite possible that someone in the centenarian age-group attended AnthroCon, at least for a day!
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Mystic, CT
Blog: [Link]
It's entirely *possible*, of course; but I'm equally willing to concede the posibility that someone put in a wrong birthdate somehow and it slipped past us.
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkBlog: [Link]
To set this question to rest once and for all:
I contacted the person who had entered the birthdate of "1908." It was a typo; the person had meant to enter 1988.
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Ardmore, PA
Website: [Link]
Blog: [Link]
I've fixed that by removing the 100+ row and incrementing the 20-year old row.
--
My LiveJournal - My Website - See what I'm doing on Twitter
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkWas this guy named McLovin, by any chance?
--
iSKUNK!
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkSPOILSPORT ! !
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Michigan
Well, while everyone's talking about age, that list got me thinking a bit (warning!) about where the attendees were coming. I went and compared, and decided that knowing how many came from where is more useful if instead you knew how many OF who was there came. In other words, the percentage of that state/country's population. Though given the numbers here, I decided upon "fans per million." I went through, and there were perhaps a couple of surprises, though most of the results were clear and predictable: generally, the closer the state was, the higher a percentage of people came. However, I think that some exceptions to the general rule might imply the general ratio of the population that happen to be fans, at least on a relative scale.
I took a look at the five countries where 10 or more people were from, and this is what it looked like, just to give you an idea of what I'm talking about:
This is relatively predictable; the United States represented the vast majority of those in attendance; pretty clear for an event that took place hundreds and hundreds of miles from any other country. The Canada, UK, and Australia represent the other major English-speaking countries of the world, so their presence makes sense. Though low, Germany had a surprising number; English is spoken by some, yes, which explains the lower rate compared to neighboring UK. However, I might speculate that perhaps Germany might have a higher percentage of the population as fans, at least among those that speak English. Similarly, I might suggest the same could be said for Canada; Considering that a number of the main population centers are considerably distant from Pittsburgh, particularly when you consider the west coast, yet Canada had some 59.7% or so of the attendance rate of the USA. A shame, I suppose, that the figures don't also break down to include province, so I could compare the rate for, say, British Columbia with those of Washington.
I'd like to get some more of this uploaded, (i.e, the state-by-state data) but working on re-formatting this data is proving to be a bit of a pain... Especially when I still want it legible. I apologize for any difficulty reading the previous list; I'll try to figure something out for the US list, which is vastly larger; (and I also included data to try to figure out how much distance figures into the equation) so it's certainly going to need it!
- Login or register to post comments
permalinkLocation: Mystic, CT
Blog: [Link]
This is an interesting data breakdown thus far, indeed. I hope you'll continue working on it!
And indeed, while Anthrocon certainly has draw from multiples of nations and states, we're not going to deny that there's a 'local market', of people within a day's drive range, that attends. Every convention has to be placed somewhere, and that physical proximity means that local folks are more likely to attend.
- Login or register to post comments
permalink